|
 |
indexBtn

Tuesday, 20 November 2007
In his poem, “To a Mouse, on Turning Her Up in Her Nest with
the Plough”, Robert Burns wrote one of his most famous mis-quoted
lines: “The best-laid schemes o’ mice an men gang aft agley”.
I always remembered this line as “the best laid plans…”,
which is why I have associated this poem with our house building
plans.
I have to admit that our own house building plans have not ‘gang
agley’ (i.e. become completely ruined), like the poor mouse’s house.
However, our plans certainly have not carried through as originally
expected.
Last week, I told you about some of the design changes we had to
make, in order for our house to feel and function as we wish. This
week, I will tell you about some of the complications we dealt
with regarding windows and doors.
You will remember that, for our house to function optimally to
receive and store solar heat passively, it has been designed with
a particular proportion of glass to floor area. If we have too
much glass, then our house will overheat. With too little, then
we won't be getting as much solar energy from the sun as possible.
Of all the companies our home building has involved, it is our
windows and doors salesman that we have spent the most time and
money with. We selected the windows and doors early on, but these
items were not ordered until the walls were framed, so that exact
measurements could be made. This is because each window in our
home is unique. Some are rectangular, and others are trapezoidal
with angled tops. Some have to be `egress' windows (i.e. of a particular
size, so that one can exit quickly through them in case of fire),
and all of them must be triple-pane, Low-E and argon-filled. This
would be a challenging order to fill.
The doors began to arrive about 2-3 weeks after we ordered them. Given that our
land has lots of water, ditches and cattails, Eric and I were pleased to find
a front door that has cattails etched into the glass. In all, we ordered 7 insulated
doors, of which 4 of them arrived as ordered, and installed easily. One of the
others had incorrect glass (i.e. it was supposed to be 2/3 glass, but came with
1⁄2 glass), one was not the right size to fit the opening, and one came
with grills over the glass, that we had not ordered. All of these issues were
addressed by the company.
We had an accident with one door. Soon after it was installed, before it had
a doorknob, the door blew open in strong wind and struck the house, damaging
the door. The company was kind enough to replace this for us.
We chose this particular window manufacturer because their hardware seemed superior
to others', and they could modify their standard framing in order to accommodate
our vertical cedar siding. They gave us great service, even as difficulties arose.
When we ordered our nine windows, we found out that one of them would have to
be reduced in size. This is because a larger triple-pane window would be too
heavy for the opener hardware. Most of the windows arrived soon after the doors.
Our bathroom window arrived with clear glass, instead of frosted, but this would
be easily corrected.
Our large 3-window unit had its own challenges. It was delivered on a very windy
day, and one triple-pane glass broke on its way over on the truck. So, the company
took all the glass from the framing, and delivered it in pieces. And then, when
we tried to install it, we found that the framing was one inch too tall, a couple
of inches too narrow, and its angles did not fit the opening. Since it took many
extra weeks for this one to arrive, we chose to re-fashion the opening and install
it anyway. The glass was re-inserted, and the company would replace the broken
pane.
A big surprise _ to us and to the salesman _ was our sliding glass door. We had
ordered a nine-foot double-pane, Low-E, argon-filled door with 2 sliding panes.
The door arrived about 6 inches narrower than ordered. We then found out that
this was the maximum size it could be, for structural reasons. However, we had
not been told this ahead of time. This reduction in amount of glass (coupled
with the reduced window mentioned before) would compromise our overall solar
collection ability by about 10%. Had we known ahead of time, we could have made
up the deficit with larger windows elsewhere.
The salesman felt badly and got us a reduction on the cost. However, we are still
quite disappointed with the potential effect this will have on our passive solar
qualities.
Now that the triple-pane windows are in, I am surprised at how the extra layer
of glass (our current home has only double-panes) reduces the amount of light
into the house. I understand that the same qualities that help keep the heat
in the house, reduce some of the solar heat and light from entering too. But
the windows feel sturdy, look nice and will function well. We expect that once
our house is warm, it will stay warm because of them.
Next time: making our roof watertight
Previous Article
|
|