|
 |
indexBtn

Tuesday, 20 November 2007
Once we started putting walls onto the concrete slab foundation,
we began to see the layout of the home. And this is when we realized
that some aspects of our plan were not comfortable for us.
First, we were surprised by how narrow the doorways seemed. We
had wanted the main floor of our home to be wheelchair-accessible,
so that we could cope with this possible eventuality as we got
older. When we went to build the doorways into the framing, we
found these openings to be somewhat narrow.
We also found our stairway to be narrow. The stairs were designed
to turn ninety degrees halfway up, and when I peered up at the
opening, I wondered if our queen-sized headboard and bed frame
would even make it through. Also, the number of steps that were
expected to fit in the space reminded me more of attic stairways
than a main stairway of a 2-storey home.
Since our designer, Don Roscoe, was working in Nova Scotia, we
turned to a local "architectural technician" friend,
Christian Oulton, to do some research for us, to see if our dimensions
were consistent with the Building Code.
Christian found that our home was built to Code - but only just.
The openings for our doors were indeed wheelchair-accessible -
at the narrowest opening possible within the Code. Our stairway
was indeed steep and narrow - but this was allowed - just - by
the Building Code. Don Roscoe had been so keen to get us the most
possible living space, that he had used the smallest limits of
the Building Code for hallways, doorways and stairs.
At this point, we realized that, for our own comfort, we would
have to modify our house plans. We re-measured and adjusted, to
find room for main floor doorways with a bit more room. And, with
Christian's help, we re-designed the stairway, to make the stair
treads 9.5 inches deep and each step 7.5 inches high (they had
been 9.25 inches deep and 8 inches high). We also widened the stairway
by 6 inches. This, obviously, required room, and we had to push
a wall back 32 inches into the garage. We would not have as much
storage space for our freezer as we had planned.
We also changed the height where the ceiling met the south wall
on the upper level. Extending upwards 14 feet to a vaulted ceiling,
the original design called for a seven-foot south wall. However,
but when Eric actually stood there, he felt it to be too low. So,
we raised the height to 7.5 feet. This changed the rise and run
of the roof, and eventually demanded more complex calculations
to determine the rafter angles.
As the structure took shape, our experienced builders wondered
about the integrity of the building. Between the wall studs, there
would only be insulation and outside siding _ no other sheathing.
To our builders, this seemed flimsy, so we decided to add a layer
of sheathing. Most builders would use oriented strand board for
this purpose, however, as I said in an earlier article, there are
many good reasons to avoid this product. We decided to use three-quarter
inch tongue-and-groove spruce sheathing - a natural wood product
with little wastage.
As this exterior sheathing went up, the house took shape. We joked
that this sheathing detracted from the solar characteristics of
the home - walls really do inhibit the sun from pouring in!
I liked the sheathing so much that I decided to use this wood to
sheath the chicken coop. It was a wonderful product to work with,
and sounded so fancy that my chicken-expert-friends soon labelled
our chicken coop as a `Cadillac'. For a while, our two buildings
- the big solar home and the tiny coop - looked a bit alike… but
not for long.
Next time: more details to slow things down
Previous Article / Next Article
|
|